Local business? Support local news on VanAlstyne.city

Back to Sport

The Rebounds Sacramento Took Away From Dallas

Sacramento and Dallas tied in offensive rebounds, but the Kings controlled the defensive glass and finished enough more chances to win 115-100.

Cody Ferris· AI-assisted, edited by Jake Team

November 3, 20264 min read

NBAFinal
Sacramento Kings115
Dallas Mavericks100

November 3, 2026

A box score can make 42-35 look like a seven-possession story. Monday’s game at American Airlines Center was more precise than that. Sacramento and Dallas each collected 10 offensive rebounds, so neither team gained an advantage by extending its own missed shots.

The Kings’ seven-rebound margin came entirely on the defensive glass, where Sacramento led 32-25, and the value of that edge grew because the Kings finished far more of their other opportunities in a 115-100 victory over the Mavericks.

The split between offensive and defensive rebounds is the important piece. An offensive rebound gives a team another chance after its own miss. A defensive rebound ends the opponent’s possession.

With both teams grabbing 10 offensive boards, the rebounding line does not translate into seven bonus possessions for Sacramento. It describes a difference in who completed possessions after misses, with the Kings doing more of the work required to prevent Dallas from trying again.

Dallas also missed more field-goal attempts in raw terms, shooting 32 for 78 compared with Sacramento’s 43 for 82. That created more potential defensive rebounds for the Kings to claim, while Dallas secured fewer of Sacramento’s misses. Rebounding still required positioning and execution, but it should be read alongside the shooting rather than as an isolated explanation.

Sacramento did not merely collect the ball; it converted the next phase of the offense at a much higher rate.

The clearest separation came from outside. The Kings made 19 of 43 3-point attempts, while Dallas made 7 of 33. That 36-point difference overwhelmed several areas in which the Mavericks had real answers.

Dallas scored 40 points in the paint to Sacramento’s 38 and made 29 of 35 free throws, a 19-point advantage over the Kings’ 10-for-15 performance. Those are not the numbers of a team that was denied every route to the basket. They are the numbers of a team that found useful interior and foul-line production, then watched its perimeter offense fail to keep pace.

Daniel Gafford supplied the best example of Dallas’ interior efficiency. He scored 20 points on 9-of-10 shooting and added seven rebounds, with 15 points before halftime. In the third quarter, his basket and free throw with 6:03 remaining put Dallas ahead 65-64.

The sequence showed what the Mavericks could get when a high-percentage finisher received a workable chance: immediate points and a brief lead in a game that had been close for most of the night.

Sacramento’s answer was broader. The Kings had moved ahead after Zach LaVine’s third-quarter 3-pointer and Darius Acuff Jr.’s 3-pointer and floater, turning a 54-53 halftime lead into a 62-55 advantage. Gafford’s and-one briefly reversed the scoreboard, but Leaky Black’s 3-pointer at 5:49 restored Sacramento’s lead for good. The Kings reached the fourth quarter ahead 81-74.

Dallas did produce a credible late push. With Sacramento ahead 94-79, Walter Clayton Jr. made two 3-pointers and Morez Johnson Jr. added a dunk, cutting the deficit to seven. Clayton finished with 20 points on 6-of-9 shooting, including 4 of 5 from 3-point range, and scored 11 in the fourth quarter.

That stretch was not empty scoring; it brought Dallas back within reach and demonstrated how much better the Mavericks looked when a second perimeter source joined Gafford’s interior work.

Sacramento did not let the opening become a comeback. Acuff made two free throws, Malik Monk hit a 3-pointer and Acuff followed with a floater. Later, LaVine’s two 3-pointers pushed the Kings’ lead to 109-93 and then 112-93. The response came from several players and several kinds of finishes, which made Dallas’ late surge expensive rather than decisive.

Dallas also had a favorable turnover count, committing 16 to Sacramento’s 20 total, and scored 15 points off those giveaways. That advantage helped keep the game playable. It could not compensate for the difference in made field goals, especially from deep.

Gafford’s finishing, the 29 free throws and the 40 paint points gave Dallas enough offense to remain nearby; Sacramento’s defensive rebounds and 43 made shots gave it control of the spaces after Dallas’ misses.

So 42-35 is not a seven-possession verdict. It is a compact record of Sacramento ending more Dallas possessions while both teams tied in second chances.

The Kings’ 1-6 record made the result easy to treat as an odd night, but the arithmetic was less mysterious: Dallas had enough interior efficiency to stay close, while Sacramento finished enough more opportunities to make the rebounding margin meaningful without turning it into something it was not.

Sources

ESPN: final game record and play-by-play

NBA: official game report

Mavericks: regional broadcast footprint

NBA: final box score

Share

Cody Ferris· AI-assisted, edited by Jake Team

Cody Ferris covers Van Alstyne Panthers athletics and area high school and college sports.

Related Stories

More in Weather