Local business? Support local news on VanAlstyne.city

Back to Texas

Appeals court strikes down the 1958 federal ban on shipping switchblades across state lines

A Fifth Circuit panel ruled Wednesday that the Federal Switchblade Act's interstate commerce ban violates the Second Amendment, but left in place the law's ban in places such as federal property and Indian country.

Jubal Pennington· AI-assisted, edited by Jake Team

October 24, 20262 min read

Legal Ruling - illustration, Jake Team LLC

A federal appeals court that covers Texas has ruled that the decades-old federal ban on moving switchblade knives across state lines violates the Second Amendment.

A three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit issued the opinion Wednesday, Oct. 21, in a case brought by the advocacy group Knife Rights Inc., two Texas-based businesses and five individuals. Chief Judge Jennifer Walker Elrod wrote the opinion, joined by Judges Willett and Wilson.

What the law does

Congress passed the Federal Switchblade Act in 1958. One section makes it a crime to knowingly bring switchblades into interstate commerce, make them for that purpose, or transport or distribute them across state lines, with penalties of up to $2,000 in fines and five years in prison.

The law defines a switchblade as a knife whose blade opens automatically, either by pressing a button or other device in the handle or through inertia or gravity.

A House report from the time said lawmakers wanted to take away what it called "one of the favorite weapons of our juvenile and criminal element," the opinion notes.

How the court ruled

Applying the framework from the Supreme Court's Bruen decision, the panel found that switchblades are "arms" covered by the Second Amendment. That shifted the burden to the government to show the interstate ban fits the nation's history of weapons regulation, and the panel said it did not.

The government pointed to historical laws that restricted how concealable weapons could be carried. The court said that showed a tradition of regulating the manner of carrying such weapons, not of banning their sale and transport the way the 1958 law does.

A federal judge in the Northern District of Texas had dismissed the challenge, finding the interstate ban did not amount to an effective ban on owning a switchblade. The appeals court reversed that part of the ruling.

What stays in place

The challengers lost on a second section of the law, which bars making, selling or possessing switchblades in U.S. territories, in Indian country and in other areas under special federal jurisdiction.

The government argued that section is clearly constitutional in places such as courthouses, federal prisons, military bases, embassies and certain aircraft, and the panel agreed the challengers had not shown the section is invalid in every case.

The court sent the case back to the district court for further proceedings.

Sources

ca5.uscourts.gov

ca5.uscourts.gov

Share

Jubal Pennington· AI-assisted, edited by Jake Team

Jubal Pennington writes about community life, schools, public safety, and neighborhood happenings around Van Alstyne.

Related Stories

More in Sport